OC logo


Skip to main content

HIST 219 - Deb Lamb - Winter 2011: What is a Scholarly Source?

Native American history.

Guidelines for determining if a source is scholarly

Generally scholarly sources have the following characteristics:

  • Written for a specialized audience
  • Articles by subject experts
  • Authors from academic institutions (see article below for exceptions)
  • Highly focused topics
  • Primary research or literature reviews
  • Peer-reviewed
  • Include bibliographies

Having academic credentials (an advanced degree) is not enough to make someone a subject expert; the degree must be in the subject or a closely related subject that the person is writing about.  For instance, someone who has a PhD in economics and writes about nutrition is not a nutritional subject expert.

Source consulted:  Quaratiello, A. R. (2007).  Finding periodicals.  The college student's research companion (4th ed.). New York: Neal-Schuman. 


Further information

The following article was written by Darby Ray, Professor of Religious Studies at Millsaps College, and is posted here with her permission:

Identifying Scholarly Sources

In general, a "scholarly" source is one that is written or edited by a "scholar"—that is, a person who has earned a graduate degree in the field they are writing about. Having such a degree (usually a Ph.D.; synonym: a doctorate) means the person has had to prove that they have studied the field extensively and have mastered it well enough to be considered an expert in it. This doesn't mean that the person's interpretation of their field is beyond question or debate; rather, it means that they at least know enough about the field to have an INFORMED interpretation (in other words, one that others ought at least to consider).

People who are professors at a college or university may safely be considered "scholars" because they have usually earned a graduate degree in their field of knowledge.

People who publish books can usually be considered "scholars" because most publishers only publish books that have been reviewed by two or more experts in a field, which means that at least a couple of experts have agreed that the author of the book is well enough informed about their chosen subject matter to be considered a scholar. Hence, a book may usually be considered a "scholarly" source.

Articles in a journal published by a college or university can be considered "scholarly" because "scholars" have approved those articles.

Articles in a journal published by a scholarly group such as the American Medical Association or the American Bar Association or the Modern Language Association can be considered "scholarly" because, once again, such articles have been reviewed by experts in the field.

If you aren't sure whether or not the group that publishes a journal is "scholarly" or not (for instance, maybe you've never heard of the Modern Language Association and so don't know that it is the association of college and university English professors), you can look at the section in the journal where the list of editors is given. Scholarly journals usually list not only the editors' names but also their academic credentials (what degrees they have earned, or where they are a professor). If a journal offers no such list, then chances are it is NOT a scholarly journal because if it were, it would list the names and credentials of its scholars. You can find this information by looking at a hard copy of the journal or by visiting the journal's webpage and searching for its list of editors.

If you run across a random article on the Internet, you need to ask at least two questions:

  • Who wrote the article, and is that writer a "scholar" (see definition of scholar above)? If no credentials of the author are listed, then he or she is probably NOT a scholar. If no author is listed, then the source is definitely NOT a scholarly source.
  • Is the article sponsored by a scholarly organization (such as a university or college or scholarly journal)? If so, it can usually be assumed to be a scholarly source.

Magazines like Time and Newsweek often have good information in them, but because they usually do not document how they got that information (whether it came from reliable, well-informed sources or not), and because the authors of their articles are not usually "scholars" (refer to definition above), they are not usually considered scholarly sources.

I hope this explanation helps you determine whether or not your sources are scholarly.

Darby Ray, Ph.D.